Skip to content
Relativity1, RelativityOne, Relativity-One, RelOne, Pre-trial-preparation, eDiscovery, eCourts, DataCollection, DocumentReview, EvidencePresentation, EvidenceProcessing, Analytics, AssistedReview, EarlyCaseAssessment, LegalTechnology, eLitigation, Litigator, Production, Nuix Discover, NuixDiscover, Nuix-Discover, Delium, elaw
  • About Us
  • eLitigation
    • eLitigation Software
  • eDiscovery
    • Information Governance
    • Data Collection and ECA
  • eTrials
  • Matter Types
  • Managed Services
  • Ostentus
  • Resources
    • News
    • Insights
    • Responding to Regulator Requests
  • Contact Us
    • 1300 30 30 80
    • [email protected]
  • About Us
  • eLitigation
    • eLitigation Software
  • eDiscovery
    • Information Governance
    • Data Collection and ECA
  • eTrials
  • Matter Types
  • Managed Services
  • Ostentus
  • Resources
    • News
    • Insights
    • Responding to Regulator Requests
  • Contact Us
    • 1300 30 30 80
    • [email protected]

Using Technology Assisted Review

Relativity1, RelativityOne, Relativity-One, RelOne, Pre-trial-preparation, eDiscovery, eCourts, DataCollection, DocumentReview, EvidencePresentation, EvidenceProcessing, Analytics, AssistedReview, EarlyCaseAssessment, LegalTechnology, eLitigation, Litigator, Production, Nuix Discover, NuixDiscover, Nuix-Discover, Delium, brisbane-city-drone-aerail-from-west_1920_2, Brisbane

Using Technology Assisted Review

News
/
March 8, 2018
/
Monica Dunne

The Supreme Court of Victoria’s new Practice Notes are now in effect. This includes Practice Note SC GEN 5 – Technology in Civil Litigation which provides for the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) in discovery. TAR will ordinarily be accepted, particularly where the costs of manually searching large volumes of documents are not reasonable and proportionate. Significantly, the Court may order discovery by TAR regardless of whether it is consented to by the parties.

The Supreme Court of Victoria Practice Note SC GEN 5 is consistent with the Federal Court Technology and the Court Practice Note (GPN-TECH), and recent decision in McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Santam Ltd, which both support predictive coding. While most Australian litigators are still unfamiliar with TAR, elaw’s consultants have been using predictive coding for years. Please join us for a free CPD lunch seminar in Melbourne which will explain predictive coding and provide a practical insight with reference to an elaw case study.

Sydney

1106/187 Liverpool Street
Sydney NSW 2000

Melbourne

C/O Hub Australia
Level 2, 696 Bourke Street
Melbourne VIC 3000

Brisbane

Riparian Plaza
Level 38
71 Eagle St
Brisbane QLD 4000

Perth

The Forrest Centre
Level 29
221 St Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000

Adelaide

Tower 2 Level 5
121 King William St
Adelaide SA 5000

Relativity1, RelativityOne, Relativity-One, RelOne, Pre-trial-preparation, eDiscovery, eCourts, DataCollection, DocumentReview, EvidencePresentation, EvidenceProcessing, Analytics, AssistedReview, EarlyCaseAssessment, LegalTechnology, eLitigation, Litigator, Production, Nuix Discover, NuixDiscover, Nuix-Discover, Delium, elaw
  • About Us
  • eLitigation
    • eLitigation Software
  • eDiscovery
    • Information Governance
    • Data Collection and ECA
  • eTrials
  • Matter Types
  • Managed Services
  • Ostentus
  • Resources
    • News
    • Insights
    • Responding to Regulator Requests
  • Contact Us
    • 1300 30 30 80
    • [email protected]
  • About Us
  • eLitigation
    • eLitigation Software
  • eDiscovery
    • Information Governance
    • Data Collection and ECA
  • eTrials
  • Matter Types
  • Managed Services
  • Ostentus
  • Resources
    • News
    • Insights
    • Responding to Regulator Requests
  • Contact Us
    • 1300 30 30 80
    • [email protected]